timescale / helm-charts

Configuration and Documentation to run TimescaleDB in your Kubernetes cluster
Apache License 2.0
264 stars 223 forks source link

Is it still maintained ? #596

Open throrin19 opened 1 year ago

throrin19 commented 1 year ago

Is the project still on track? Would it be only this one but also timescaledb-ha?

It's been several weeks or even months that problems with Patroni are present but nothing seems to change, as well as several configuration questions which are not answered due to validation problems with the charts configurations.

This naturally leads to this question: Is the project still active? Or is it "paused" to favor timescaledb Cloud over self-hosted?

sumerman commented 1 year ago

Apologies, I had my wires crossed and replied as if you were asking about promscale.

cryptobench commented 1 year ago

Bump. Following this

fungiboletus commented 1 year ago

Bump. Following this

You can also add a thumb up on the first message and click the "subscribe" button 🙂

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue went stale because it was not updated in a month. Please consider updating it to improve the quality of the project.

throrin19 commented 1 year ago

I think the github bot comment respond for us.

Can you confirm @feikesteenbergen ?

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue went stale because it was not updated in a month. Please consider updating it to improve the quality of the project.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue went stale because it was not updated in a month. Please consider updating it to improve the quality of the project.

mindrunner commented 1 year ago

It is hardly maintained. PR reviews take ages and (as of my experience) only happen when you run after it. A quite important fix for something I filed about half a year ago is still not released to the helm repos (even though it was already merged to master weeks ago).

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue went stale because it was not updated in a month. Please consider updating it to improve the quality of the project.

timclifford commented 1 year ago

Is someone able to give an update on the situation from the maintainers? Just so people can get a measure and plan a little better

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue went stale because it was not updated in a month. Please consider updating it to improve the quality of the project.

mindrunner commented 1 year ago

^^

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue went stale because it was not updated in a month. Please consider updating it to improve the quality of the project.

Snazzie commented 1 year ago

bad bot

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue went stale because it was not updated in a month. Please consider updating it to improve the quality of the project.

Snazzie commented 1 year ago

bad bot

tobywinnow commented 1 year ago

Is it time for us to fork this and create a community managed helm chart? The lack of engagement with PRs seems quite deliberate here.

mindrunner commented 1 year ago

image

mindrunner commented 1 year ago

I have repeatedly offered my assistance to the project and inquired about the possibility of becoming an official maintainer. At that time, I was already managing my own fork, which included patches that were not merged into the main project. Unfortunately, this initiative did not succeed, and eventually, our communication diminished.

Currently, I am no longer working full-time with timescaledb, which limits my ability to lead such a project. An actively maintained Helm chart is essential for running this in a production environment, particularly because this chart is complex and still has several issues that need resolution.

github-actions[bot] commented 11 months ago

This issue went stale because it was not updated in a month. Please consider updating it to improve the quality of the project.

throrin19 commented 11 months ago

Bad bot....