timescale / timescaledb

An open-source time-series SQL database optimized for fast ingest and complex queries. Packaged as a PostgreSQL extension.
https://www.timescale.com/
Other
16.83k stars 852 forks source link

Release 2.15.1 #6966

Closed fabriziomello closed 1 month ago

fabriziomello commented 1 month ago

This release contains bug fixes since the 2.15.0 release. Best practice is to upgrade at the next available opportunity.

Migrating from self-hosted TimescaleDB v2.14.x and earlier

After you run ALTER EXTENSION, you must run this SQL script. For more details, see the following pull request #6797.

If you are migrating from TimescaleDB v2.15.0, no changes are required.

Bugfixes

Thanks

Disable-check: force-changelog-file

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 81.70%. Comparing base (59f50f2) to head (289a9b2). Report is 184 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #6966 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 80.06% 81.70% +1.63% ========================================== Files 190 198 +8 Lines 37181 36858 -323 Branches 9450 9631 +181 ========================================== + Hits 29770 30115 +345 + Misses 2997 2864 -133 + Partials 4414 3879 -535 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

adschmu commented 1 month ago

Is the 2.15.X-fix_hypertable_foreign_keys.sql script still required? It is not entirely clear whether "For [...] this release only" refers to 2.15.0 or 2.15.X.

The file name hints at it, but it would be helpful to include the one sentence about the script into these release notes again, if it still applies. There might be people not reading all of the previous changelogs, and the script is more like a "Known issues" bullet point anyway ...

intermittentnrg commented 1 month ago

Duplicate of #6970 which is already merged?

fabriziomello commented 1 month ago

Duplicate of #6970 which is already merged?

Actually no... we need to have two release PRs, one for the main branch and another for the release branch, in this case 2.15.x (actually the release branch PR is usually made by cherry picking the one against the main branch, but this time we rushed a bit). Thanks for reviewing!