nus-pe-bot
commented
2 years ago Team's Response
A duplicate of #4288
The description is meant to end at "is used to create a conjunctive search." Hence the severity is decreased to low as the difference does not affect the understanding of the reader. It only hinders the reader a bit as stated.
The 'Original' Bug
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Incomplete Description
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2122S1/pe-interim#4229] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]
Their Response to the 'Original' Bug
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
Accepted.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
:question: Issue severity
Team chose [severity.Low]
Originally [severity.High]
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: I disagree with the decision to rate this bug as severity.Low.
Firstly, this issue will still be noticed and hence cause some level of initial confusion to almost all readers of this guide, and should therefore be categorised as severity.Medium at the very least, as it fits that criteria.
To add to that, even if there is indeed no loss in information as you stated, this is not something that a reader would know, and hence they would face a considerable hindrance when reading, as it is reasonable that they may assume that they lack a key piece of information. As such, it can be argued that the severity should be marked as High.
Text is cut off under the implementation description of the Find Feature.
Likely to hinder the reader's ability to understand the implementation regarding handling multiple keywords within categories.