brianstock-NOAA
commented
2 years ago Agreed. This would also cover Jon's request for plots/tables to compare parameters controlling observation and process errors. I have code to extract some of these and shouldn't be too hard to generalize (famous last words). Also would be good to show 95% CI for selectivity-at-age, bc large differences in mean sel pars between models may not be significant.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:09 AM Tim Miller @.***> wrote:
We need to add tables of all estimated fixed effects parameters with SEs, and/or CIs on the interpretable scale into the wham output. It will help users understand results better. E.g., why is there no variation in selectivity random effects? Because the variance estimate is ~0.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/timjmiller/wham/issues/51, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOV5B6RBPP6PHDF5BW7YCVTUJKTIDANCNFSM5G7NRGSQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
--
Brian Stock, PhD (he/his)
Contractor with Ocean Associates, Inc. in support of Population Dynamics Branch, NEFSC
NOAA Fisheries | U.S. Department of Commerce www.fisheries.noaa.gov
timjmiller
We need to add tables of all estimated fixed effects parameters with SEs, and/or CIs on the interpretable scale into the wham output. It will help users understand results better. E.g., why is there no variation in selectivity random effects? Because the variance estimate is ~0.