either change the columns so it's '...package / new ver / old ver / arch...', or prepend some text at the top of the package update information tab's text area (above the changelog, even if it says 'no update information is available')
i also dont understand why 'ver' & 'repo' in particular are shortened, their column width & content are never so short to not be able to fit the entire words 'version' & 'repository' into the column heading
now that i think about it, shouldnt the size column be put before summary? should the user be able to reorder columns (if draggable is too complex, maybe some config file)?
either change the columns so it's '...package / new ver / old ver / arch...', or prepend some text at the top of the package update information tab's text area (above the changelog, even if it says 'no update information is available')
i also dont understand why 'ver' & 'repo' in particular are shortened, their column width & content are never so short to not be able to fit the entire words 'version' & 'repository' into the column heading
now that i think about it, shouldnt the size column be put before summary? should the user be able to reorder columns (if draggable is too complex, maybe some config file)?