search

timofeysie / khipu

Electron PWA starter
MIT License
4 stars 1 forks source link

correlative-based fallacies seems like a category #65

Open timofeysie opened 3 years ago

timofeysie commented 3 years ago

Section titles shouldn't show up as items.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlative-based_fallacies

There are three items on the page.

timofeysie commented 3 years ago

Also, Begging the question is an item that has a sub item in a list. The sub-item is: Circular reasoning (circulus in demonstrando) – the reasoner begins with what he or she is trying to end up with (e.g.: all bachelors are unmarried males).

Therefore circular reasoning also needs to be added to the list. In the case of correlative-based fallacies, it appears from the Wikipedia page that it is not an item, but there is a description, and it leads to a valid page, so even though I can't find the description on the list of fallacies page, it works well as part of the list. So it should remain, but the mechanism with which it is added to the list and where the description comes from should be formalised in the business logic.