Closed joshgoebel closed 2 years ago
What would you think of adding scheme-slug-underscored
to this PR, rather than the next spec change?
Why? I think typically small PRS are better than large PR's.
I think perhaps we need to start releasing spec versions so that main can sometimes be in between versions.
Or just a next branch or something.
I actually thought of this as a minor documentation fix but I guess if we're being picky you could argue that it's a new version of the spec. But that's why I say that we need releases or a separate branch.
I don't think it benefits us to treat such tiny changes as spec versions.
Ah, wait, I might have been thinking of a different PR...
EDIT: yeah, my bad - I was thinking of https://github.com/base16-project/base16/pull/16 which accidentally got closed when the builder PR was merged in.
I actually thought of this as a minor documentation fix but I guess if we're being picky you could argue that it's a new version of the spec. But that's why I say that we need releases or a separate branch.
I don't think it benefits us to treat such tiny changes as spec versions.
Yes, I agree - it should be possible to work on scheme changes without being forced to release them as a new version. I don't really want to figure out a git workflow for that just yet though.
I don't really want to figure out a git workflow for that just yet though.
I don't know that we need a "workflow"... just let main float, and do a Github "release" when we release a new version... perhaps a minor update to the readme to explain this.
Attempts to resolve #14.