Open n-dempe opened 5 years ago
Data 1: Spindle Length: Plugin vs Manual Data 2: DNA Length: Plugin vs Manual Data 3: Spindle Width: Plugin vs new Plugin (Min+Max)/2 Data 4: Spindle Length: Manual 0.3µm vs Manual 0.75µm Data 5: Spindle Width: Manual vs Plugin vs new Plugin (Min+Max)/2 Data 6: Spindle Length: Manual 0.3µm vs Plugin 0.3µm vs Manual 0.75µm vs Plugin 0.75µm
Data 1.pdf Data 2.pdf Data 3.pdf Data 4.pdf Data 5.pdf Data 6.pdf
It appears like the outcome of both versions is the same for: Spindle Length DNA Length
The different results in Spindle Width is explainable by a different processing of the data in min/max instead of the average distance.
Is that a result we expected? Shouldn't the use of the 2nd derivative lead to another outcome?