Open inezpereira opened 4 years ago
Hi @InezPereira, thanks for the feedback. And yes, it should be the same as you mentioned! I'll check the output for you soonish.
@InezPereira this is really a bug from the linear programming setup, it seems! I'm investigating on this issue. Mainly, there is a shifted solution that still satisfies the constraints that we gave.
Hi @titipata! I'm sure you have been super busy with Neuromatch 2.0, but I was wondering if you have had time to look at this bug or have any suspicion of what might be failing. :)
Hello! I was just trying out mindmatch.py and there is something I don’t get from the output. If we take for example the provided data/output_match.csv :
user_id,match_ids 1,93;217;463;645;783;1101 […] 217,97;304;731;792;1010;1134
Shouldn't user_id 217 also have 1 in its match_ids?
I also tried the function on some data of mine and I get the same situation.