Closed hypnopump closed 6 years ago
Sadly, NASNet models are far too large to train on my 4gb GPU. Weights for CIFAR won't be possible. I will however submit a training script which should be very close to the original.
The only differences would be the cutout augmentation and drop path regularization - which may affect performance.
Weights for ImageNet are now available. The size of the input must be 224 or 331 however.
I've tried it on Crestle (2 hours of free GPU Nvidia K80 per account and no credit card required) - https://crestle.com and it doesn't seem to work properly as described in the paper... I'll try another time and see
This may be due to their use of stochastic droppath as well as dropout for all Cifar models.
That + the cutout augmentation seems to be rather important to get a noticeable increase in performance.
Have you managed to train NASNet Cifar on the cifar10 dataset? If yes, which results have you obtained? Thanks in advance.