The attached patch allows us to:
1) parse Q values lists (section 2.9 RFC 2616)
2) determine which encodings can be used to encode the body of a request's
response, according to the Accept-Encoding header of the request (section
14.3 RFC 2616).
Let me know what you think about the patch and if any improvement is needed.
Extensive tests can be found in the patch.
cheers
Original issue reported on code.google.com by fdman...@gmail.com on 16 Jan 2010 at 7:15
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
fdman...@gmail.com
on 16 Jan 2010 at 7:15Attachments: