Closed tjgalvin closed 3 weeks ago
In the current continuum pipeline the expectation is either:
In both cases the columns are modified to allow the casa gaincal + applysolutions to work with the expected DATA and CORRECT_DATA column names.
To date these operations have been done in the self-cal function. Now that flint can allow:
it might make sense to take out the copy and renaming handling from the casa self-cal task.
This is all to be considered. Doing so might mean another CLI operation to make sure things can be tested manually in isolation.
Addressed in #120
In the current continuum pipeline the expectation is either:
In both cases the columns are modified to allow the casa gaincal + applysolutions to work with the expected DATA and CORRECT_DATA column names.
To date these operations have been done in the self-cal function. Now that flint can allow:
it might make sense to take out the copy and renaming handling from the casa self-cal task.
This is all to be considered. Doing so might mean another CLI operation to make sure things can be tested manually in isolation.