Closed webframp closed 10 years ago
And last line should be like this
;;; nm.el ends here
Unfortunately this is a multi-file package at the moment. Haven't found the time to figure that out yet.
@tjim It's not a problem for MELPA if it's a multi-file package: as long as the main .el
file contains the correct layout and metadata, we can use it to build the package.
Ok, I can see that MELPA is doing something different from vanilla emacs. I'll take a look.
Hopefully working
Looks good to me: MELPA recipe has been merged, and packages should start building soon.
Since nm.el
doesn't directly require nm-company
, it would actually be possible to split nm-company
out into a separate package which depends on company
: this way, it would be an optional extra for nm
, and nm
wouldn't need to depend on company
.
Thanks. There's been some activity on possibly merging in my address completion code directly into notmuch, at which point I'd be able to remove the nm-company.el from the package anyway, so I'll wait a bit before deciding on splitting that out.
:+1: Makes sense, thanks.
I notice that the package does not appear on melpa http://melpa.milkbox.net/#/ It was there a couple of days ago, however, it did not have a description. If anyone knows how to fix let me know.
The package name "nevermore" was incorrect, since there's neither a nevermore.el
nor a nevermore-pkg.el
-- so the package name on MELPA is nm
: http://melpa.milkbox.net/#/nm
Adds basic package headers so package can be used with melpa