Closed tkem closed 5 years ago
Renaming (and therefore effectively dropping mem_fn_row
) turns out to be a burden in practice, since this will effectively break application code when moving to C++17. So both should be kept, and basic_row
probably too for now.
It's kind of awkward to use, and with C++17 serves no real purpose any more. Also think about renaming
mem_fn_row
to simplyrow
on C++11, should be reasonably forward-compatible with the C++17 implementation (except for overloaded member functions).