I noticed there is an inconsistency between the code and the project licensing. On the github project page, the license is MIT. But in the code the licensing is dual licensed.
The dual licensing prevents commercial use due to the fact you would have to make our code GPL as well. We cannot use it in our company because of that.
I decided to write because I thought maybe that is a mistake and MIT is really the license you wished to use? If you want to use MIT, then the two license files in the repo and the licensing section in the pom.xml file would have to be changed.
Hi guys :)
I noticed there is an inconsistency between the code and the project licensing. On the github project page, the license is MIT. But in the code the licensing is dual licensed.
The dual licensing prevents commercial use due to the fact you would have to make our code GPL as well. We cannot use it in our company because of that.
I decided to write because I thought maybe that is a mistake and MIT is really the license you wished to use? If you want to use MIT, then the two license files in the repo and the licensing section in the pom.xml file would have to be changed.
Let me know!