Closed huckiyang closed 6 years ago
I have added simulation timestamp [in ms] to the observations. It was easy - see this commit
and plese check result in: tcp_newreno.py
BTW. Are you sure that you use the same (or at least similar) network topology in ns-2?
Dear @pgawlowicz and ns3-gym team,
Just a question and some echos. After successfully running the test_tcp.py, I collected the results from the actions and observation and got the part of the table below to represent TCP-NewReno
CSV flie Here
Regarding to existing TCP-NewReno in ns-2/ns-3, we shall be able to plot the x = ['simulate time (mms)'], y = ['cwnd'] as below fig in ns-2/ns-3
Since the results we got for the y-axis is the 'stepIdx' instead of the 'time'
As the potential Benchmark for adaptive/learning-based network simulator, is it possible to get the time parameters to compare the existing results as NewReno in ns3-gym? Otherwise, it is still a bit hard to validate the future rl-algorithms on the ns3-gym testbed with existing results in ns-2/ns-3.
Again many thanks for your amazing works on this research project, :)