Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Probably should just strip out xsi:* attributes.
Original comment by jjc.jclark.com
on 12 Jan 2011 at 4:21
Fixing this issue would also solve my problem with the attached RNC schema,
which allows Jing to validate the desired XML, also attached, but the xsi:type
attribute messes up the conversion to XSD.
Deleting the xsi:type attribute produces an XSD which will validate the XML,
including the datatype checking, so stripping the xsi:* attributes should work
fine.
Original comment by taraAt...@gmail.com
on 14 Feb 2011 at 7:25
Attachments:
I have the same problem generating an XSD from an XML with Trang. It only
validates after removing those two lines from the XSD (see examples attached,
the example.xsd being generated and the example-fixed.xsd being fixed manually):
<xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" schemaLocation="xsi.xsd"/>
<xs:attribute ref="xsi:schemaLocation" use="required"/>
For reference: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/ 3.2.6 says the {target
namespace} of an attribute declaration, whether local or top-level, must not
match http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance (unless it is one of four
built-in declarations).
Original comment by smile.in...@googlemail.com
on 24 Aug 2011 at 9:54
Attachments:
Hi ,
I am also facing same issue for XML to XSD conversion.
Attached sample xml where ,
<Root xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="file:/C:/Users/Amruta%20Vispute/Documents/JTSpecXSD/X12-006040-850.xsd">
Here it is creating 2 xsd files :
Apart from main xsd , creating xsi.xsd as below :
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
targetNamespace="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<xs:import schemaLocation="x12_990_180215.xsd"/>
<xs:attribute name="noNamespaceSchemaLocation" type="xs:anyURI"/>
</xs:schema>
Original comment by amruta.v...@gslab.com
on 18 Feb 2015 at 1:30
Attachments:
Could a fix for this issue also address #186?
Original comment by uja...@gmail.com
on 7 May 2015 at 10:35
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ankitgoe...@gmail.com
on 21 Dec 2010 at 6:19Attachments: