Believe it or not, a fix is in some place client side, albeit a temporary one.
We've decided to add numbers to the names of users because of the way our current NetworkStream routine handles client data. It's pseudorandom, and the probability of getting the same user twice is (probably?) low. That being said, this issue is still a problem if both users happen to have the same name with the same numbers. This ticket will remain open until an actual fix is developed.
Believe it or not, a fix is in some place client side, albeit a temporary one.
We've decided to add numbers to the names of users because of the way our current NetworkStream routine handles client data. It's pseudorandom, and the probability of getting the same user twice is (probably?) low. That being said, this issue is still a problem if both users happen to have the same name with the same numbers. This ticket will remain open until an actual fix is developed.