tlaukkanen / mobile-trail-explorer

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/mobile-trail-explorer
2 stars 0 forks source link

Delete "TileList" to force re-read of MTEFileCache #177

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. "New Feature"
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Possibility to delete the system-file "TileList" to force a re-read of the
MTEFileCache
OR
MTE checks the date/time of the MTEFileCache and recognize an update of the
MTEFileCache.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
v1.15B

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by andreas....@gmx.at on 5 May 2009 at 7:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I've implemented a solution for the problem with date-check of MTEFileCache.
After reading MTEFileCache the lastmodified-date is save at the settings.

Original comment by andreas....@gmx.at on 7 May 2009 at 12:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Do you have a patch for this?

Original comment by gdjo...@gmail.com on 23 May 2009 at 5:26

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
sorry, I didn't have a patch.
I've attached the modified files.

Original comment by andreas....@gmx.at on 25 May 2009 at 9:16

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Just recognized: Method getLongProperty(java.lang.String,int) in class Settings 
is
missing, maybe you forgot to attach your modified Settings.java?

Original comment by joachim....@gmail.com on 27 May 2009 at 8:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Yes, you're right, I've forgotten to attach also the Settings.java
I've added "setLongProperty(...)" and "getLongProperty(...)"
Sorry!

Original comment by andreas....@gmx.at on 27 May 2009 at 2:20

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Perfect, I just made a patch out of it, and tested it successfully. :-)

Original comment by joachim....@gmail.com on 28 May 2009 at 2:45

Attachments: