Open sebastiaanspeck opened 1 month ago
Hi, I wouldn't suggest bringing back the stale action even in a fine-tuned way given the previous experiences we had with it, since some PRs are intentionally left unmerged/unreviewed for a while due to various reasons like waiting for author's feedback, etc.
If others think this is required, then I would suggest adding a review-required label alone rather than commenting.
Looking at the bunch of PRs we sometimes have, and the small amount of PRs that are intentionally left unmerged/unreviewed, I still would suggest to add this. We could only add a label to the configuration.
name: "Mark PRs as review needed"
on:
schedule:
- cron: "0 0 1 * *"
workflow_dispatch:
jobs:
stale:
name: "Mark PRs as review needed"
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/stale@v9
with:
stale-pr-label: "review needed"
days-before-stale: -1
days-before-close: -1
days-before-pr-stale: 14
remove-pr-stale-when-updated: true
I don't think it's necessary, but as long as it doesn't automatically close PRs like before, I'm fine with it.
https://github.com/actions/stale