Closed rvanmazijk closed 4 years ago
Spalink et al. - 2018 - The spatial structure of phylogenetic and function.pdf Spalink et al. - 2016 - Biogeography of the cosmopolitan sedges (Cyperacea.pdf Spalink et al. - 2016 - Evolution of geographical place and niche space P.pdf
I found three papers from Daniel Spalink that Muthama might have been referring to. I took a brief look at them this evening and will look at them tomorrow. There are a couple of analyses that could be adapted for our work, but I think that we would have to use more current methods and approaches (especially with regards to the 2016 papers).
Spalink et al. 2016 - Evolution of geographical place and niche space (Carex)
Some ideas: we could do a similar visualization showing Schoenus richness per grid cell
I did not find the PGLS nor species tree/geography tree visualizations very informative. I think that if we want to compare the ranges for different Schoenus species in an evolutionary context, a different method would probably be more suitable for our data and questions.
Spalink et al. 2018 - The spatial structure of phylogenetic and functional diversity in the United States and Canada: An example using the sedge family (Cyperaceae))
Some ideas: there are some more analyses/visualizations that we can consider:
Predictions:
Spalink et al. 2016 - Biogeography of the cosmopolitan sedges (Cyperaceae) and the area‐richness correlation in plants
Some key points about the analyses:
Hypotheses:
Spalink et al. 2016 - Evolution of geographical place and niche space (Carex)
Some ideas: we could do a similar visualization showing Schoenus richness per grid cell
- we have the data for the Southern African Schoenus
- I recommend searching out a better method to create the visualization
- speciation through time is possible with our data set (I think). We could look at this with different characters and do the BAMM analyses, such as in this paper, but I don't know if we would find anything interesting
I did not find the PGLS nor species tree/geography tree visualizations very informative. I think that if we want to compare the ranges for different Schoenus species in an evolutionary context, a different method would probably be more suitable for our data and questions.
We discussed this paper in a recent journal club. I (and the rest of the journal club, likely) agree that the PGLS things they did was not particularly insightful. Their range/habitat data, also, makes sense for wider-ranging North American species, but not necessarily for ours.
From the last couple of years.
Muthama mentioned that they use some interesting analyses.