Closed a-slide closed 5 years ago
I think this might have been a problem before as well (at least for the Anova test), but I went unnoticed because of the lack of strict
...
The issue is that the samples are treated independently by most of the code, and the relationship sample->condition is tracked by the dict sample_condition_labels
.
I think the easiest solution is to force the user to use different names with a check in SampComp.
Do you think it's acceptable?
We could but it is not very elegant. What about renaming replicates by concatenating the condition and replicates names ?
Fixed in branch doc. https://github.com/tleonardi/nanocompore/commit/152cc6e5c9e8946f74006f353017221d6e4cf3c9 Sample labels are used as a prefix of the rep names if any duplicated replicate names are found
You cannot have replicate called the same in the 2 conditions. I assumed it uses only 1 condition if not as it raises 0 variance errors.
Doesn't work
Works fine
The problem started after txComp refactor