Closed lucasvandijck closed 1 year ago
@lucasvandijck , thanks for adding mobilenet. Could you maybe reuse the upsampling block from the convnext to avoid code duplication?
Again, I did not write test functions.
That's okay. All registered backbones get tested here
@lucasvandijck , thanks for adding mobilenet. Could you maybe reuse the upsampling block from the convnext to avoid code duplication?
Again, I did not write test functions.
That's okay. All registered backbones get tested here
This should be fixed. I didn't like the inter-backend dependencies, hence why I re-implemented it, but this should work fine as well.
I didn't like the inter-backend dependencies, hence why I re-implemented it, but this should work fine as well.
yeah the proper way would be to refactor that upsamplingblock, but this is still bettern than duplicating code :+1:
Based on ConvNeXt backend code, this PR adds the 3.4M param MobileNetV3 backend.
Again, I did not write test functions.