I randomly encountered the below failed test having not modified anything. This is one of the drawbacks of using rng in tests, but simultaneously some sort of benefit because now we've essentially fuzzed this test :laughing: I haven't investigated yet.
thread 'ghash::utils::tests::test_masked_xtable' panicked at 'attempt to add with overflow', tls-2pc-core/src/ghash/utils.rs:505:24
stack backtrace:
0: rust_begin_unwind
at /rustc/4b91a6ea7258a947e59c6522cd5898e7c0a6a88f/library/std/src/panicking.rs:584:5
1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
at /rustc/4b91a6ea7258a947e59c6522cd5898e7c0a6a88f/library/core/src/panicking.rs:142:14
2: core::panicking::panic
at /rustc/4b91a6ea7258a947e59c6522cd5898e7c0a6a88f/library/core/src/panicking.rs:48:5
3: tls_2pc_core::ghash::utils::tests::test_masked_xtable
at ./src/ghash/utils.rs:505:24
4: tls_2pc_core::ghash::utils::tests::test_masked_xtable::{{closure}}
at ./src/ghash/utils.rs:495:5
5: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
at /rustc/4b91a6ea7258a947e59c6522cd5898e7c0a6a88f/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:248:5
6: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
at /rustc/4b91a6ea7258a947e59c6522cd5898e7c0a6a88f/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:248:5
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
test ghash::utils::tests::test_masked_xtable ... FAILED
I randomly encountered the below failed test having not modified anything. This is one of the drawbacks of using rng in tests, but simultaneously some sort of benefit because now we've essentially fuzzed this test :laughing: I haven't investigated yet.