search

tlswg / draft-ietf-tls-esni

TLS Encrypted Client Hello
https://tlswg.github.io/draft-ietf-tls-esni/#go.draft-ietf-tls-esni.html
Other
229 stars 58 forks source link

not sure if omitting CH in IANA registry for ech_outer_extensions is right or not #502

Closed sftcd closed 3 years ago

sftcd commented 3 years ago

I don't know and pretty much don't care, but just in case this is an error... One could argue that "CH" should be set of ech_outer_extensions. I'm fine if this is just closed without discussion if it's not an error.

davidben commented 3 years ago

I think omitting it is better because it's not allowed in any actual ClientHello message. But this depends on whether you believe EncodedClientHelloInner counts as a ClientHello, so either seems defensible. :-)

chris-wood commented 3 years ago

My impression is that we consider EncodedClientHelloInner a transient representation of a ClientHello, but not an actual handshake message, so I think we can safely omit this.