Closed chris-wood closed 2 years ago
This seems like the right change (modulo analysis) but I think the use of the term "effective" is a mistake. We already carry a truncated epoch in DTLSCiphertext, so I think all that's needed is to say that the epoch field in DTLSPlaintext is also truncated but that the actual epoch is 64 bits.
so I think all that's needed is to say that the epoch field in DTLSPlaintext is also truncated but that the actual epoch is 64 bits.
Dropped "effective," so the current PR should reflect this. 👍
Based on IETF 112, closing in favor of #257.
Yet another alternative to #249.
cc @emanjon @hannestschofenig