I ran I-D nits before hitting the appropriate buttons to place this draft in WGLC. I figured we could address the following before we send the draft to Ben:
== Outdated reference: draft-ietf-tls-tls13 has been
published as RFC 8446
== Outdated reference: A later version (-14) exists of
draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https-08
== Outdated reference: A later version (-15) exists of
draft-ietf-quic-tls-11
== Outdated reference: A later version (-28) exists of
draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-26
== Outdated reference: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt has
been published as RFC 8404
To answer the other 5 I-D nits questions "Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?)” - the answer is yes.
sptAll,
I ran I-D nits before hitting the appropriate buttons to place this draft in WGLC. I figured we could address the following before we send the draft to Ben:
== Outdated reference: draft-ietf-tls-tls13 has been
published as RFC 8446
== Outdated reference: A later version (-14) exists of
draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https-08
== Outdated reference: A later version (-15) exists of
draft-ietf-quic-tls-11
== Outdated reference: A later version (-28) exists of
draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-26
== Outdated reference: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt has
been published as RFC 8404
To answer the other 5 I-D nits questions "Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?)” - the answer is yes.
All,
I ran I-D nits before hitting the appropriate buttons to place this draft in WGLC. I figured we could address the following before we send the draft to Ben:
== Outdated reference: draft-ietf-tls-tls13 has been published as RFC 8446
== Outdated reference: A later version (-14) exists of draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https-08
== Outdated reference: A later version (-15) exists of draft-ietf-quic-tls-11
== Outdated reference: A later version (-28) exists of draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-26
== Outdated reference: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt has been published as RFC 8404
To answer the other 5 I-D nits questions "Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?)” - the answer is yes.
sptAll,
I ran I-D nits before hitting the appropriate buttons to place this draft in WGLC. I figured we could address the following before we send the draft to Ben:
== Outdated reference: draft-ietf-tls-tls13 has been published as RFC 8446
== Outdated reference: A later version (-14) exists of draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https-08
== Outdated reference: A later version (-15) exists of draft-ietf-quic-tls-11
== Outdated reference: A later version (-28) exists of draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-26
== Outdated reference: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt has been published as RFC 8404
To answer the other 5 I-D nits questions "Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?)” - the answer is yes.
spt