Fix nits from General Area Review

huitema commented 5 years ago

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq.

Document: draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-05

Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour

Review Date: 2019-09-02

IETF LC End Date: 2019-09-02

IESG Telechat date: NA

Summary: This draft is ready to be published as an Informational RFC.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

Some may have already been reported…

-[Page 2], Section 1, "colocated"--->"collocated"

-[Page 3], Section 2, "mutiple"---->"multiple"

-[Page 3], Section 2.1, "fradulent"---->"fraudulent"

-[Page 4], Section 2.1, "MITM inspection", please spell out Man-In-The-Middle attack at first use

-[Page 7], Section 3.6, "is the the"---->"is the"

-[Page 10], Section 4.2, "ferver"---->"server"

Best Regards,

Meral

Meral Shirazipour

Ericsson

Research

www.ericsson.com

huitema commented 5 years ago

Not fixing "collocated" -- collocated is correct English, but colocated is established industry usage.

huitema commented 5 years ago

Fixed in PR #35

tlswg / sniencryption

Fix nits from General Area Review #33