Closed affederaffe closed 4 months ago
Probably and oversight since every other constructor is also public. Currently, the implicit operator is already public, so there is no functionality missing, it's just a matter of taste if one prefers explicit constructors or implicit conversions.
Thanks @affederaffe!
This is part of 0.19.0 which was just released on nuget.org.
Probably and oversight since every other constructor is also public. Currently, the implicit operator is already public, so there is no functionality missing, it's just a matter of taste if one prefers explicit constructors or implicit conversions.