Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by h.niederhausen@googlemail.com
on 17 Dec 2010 at 12:43
I think an implementation like this will be ambiguous or confusing.
The number of parameters will be 4, the other is to much magic.
We will add some new methods to the prepared statement like
set(String,Object)
The string argument represents the name of the wildcard, with or without ?. The
second argument is the value to set.
But using set(int,Object) will ignore the naming arguments, and will set only
the value at the given position and not at all positions of the wildcard at the
given position. A special method will be added set(Object) representing the
anoynmous wildcard and works like set("?", Object)
Original comment by Sven.Kro...@googlemail.com
on 4 Jan 2011 at 9:02
Original comment by Sven.Kro...@googlemail.com
on 4 Jan 2011 at 10:17
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
h.niederhausen@googlemail.com
on 17 Dec 2010 at 12:43