@rileyvickers @ajotcham Do any of you two have a preference for how we define the Minkowski functionals? I think I prefer the definitions in this article vs those in quantimpy. Cool if I switch it?
I like the Armstrong paper a lot. Many more citations and the quantimpy pub also cites them, so I think using the Armstrong defs are the more standard ones. Seems good to me.
@rileyvickers @ajotcham Do any of you two have a preference for how we define the Minkowski functionals? I think I prefer the definitions in this article vs those in quantimpy. Cool if I switch it?