Closed zhengkd95 closed 4 years ago
Maybe this is because the rotated Gumbel copula (14) is considered as the same family of the Gumbel copula (4). So all the derived copula families are considered together with the original family here in the familyset?
Sorry for bothering with this issue already addressed in the readme. I have focused too much on the R document. Should have read this repo in the first place.
Hi, I am using VineCopula version 2.3.0. This issue can be produced with the example code related to RVineStructureSelect:
And the following result is given from the summary:
Although the familyset is set as c(1:6), the selected families in the Rvine trees may contain others like 14.