[ ] • Bring in rarity (as observation data or underrepresented veg or settings)
[ ] • Dealing with Urban areas?
[ ] • Dealing with the central valley?
[ ] • Watersheds / water
[x] • Bring in bottoms-up- priorities and finer scale data and prioritization
Mike and Scott - Jan Update
[ ] roadkill mapping in WAZE
[x] contact Melanie to ask about plan or data on the wildlife SDMs (any new SDM data) - subset of species; first see what is in ACE
[x] look at how PLW compares to ACE priorities – bring to next working session w Dick
[x] reach out to Mark Anderson to schedule - late january
[ ] Continue - to get new diversity data – GBIF etc
NA, PNW, East Outreach:
[ ] o End of century scenarios could be very different – how will those effect climate linkage areas? (cs note: we should run this and see - my guess is the effect will be small – maybe extending or shortening the linkages, but not changing the geographic distribution of whole linkage; I probably won’t prioritize this until after we finalize biodiversity info)
[x] o Kim suggested stratifying the biodiversity data to identify the highest biodiverse area of each setting (cs note: easy to implement, I will try this)
Steering Commitee-
[ ] Urban Areas
Land Science Outreach Action mapping phase:
[ ] Landscape condition
[ ] Change from historical condition
[ ] Invasive species
[ ] - [ ] Areas that burned repeatedly
[ ] Soundscape (USFWS may have data that could be used)
[ ] Fire return interval and MTVF data
[ ] Restoration potential:oRestorability potential / fragility index (soil moisture and air temperature) -fragility index also means more valuable for protection, harder to restore
[ ] Restoration in a place with a disproportionate impact on the broader landscape
Land science: asset mapping
Mike and Scott - Jan Update
NA, PNW, East Outreach:
Steering Commitee-
Land Science Outreach Action mapping phase: