Fix issuer priority sorting

[madmatah]

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

I think there is a problem with the acme.openshift.io/priority annotation. The sorting function seems to compare each CertIssuer's priority to itself.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[openshift-ci-robot]

Welcome @madmatah! It looks like this is your first PR to tnozicka/openshift-acme 🎉

[openshift-ci-robot]

Hi @madmatah. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a tnozicka member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

[tnozicka]

/ok-to-test

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: madmatah, tnozicka

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/tnozicka/openshift-acme/blob/master/OWNERS)~~ [tnozicka] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment

[tnozicka]

/retest

[tnozicka]

/lgtm