da: CP [+declarative]
ka: CP [+declarative]
ba: CP [+declarative]
moq: CP [+interrogative]
A CP is [+declarative] if its C is and if it contains no hı/hıa.
A CP is [+interrogative] if its C is or it contains hı/hıa
lả, lâ are [+declarative] unless they head a CP containing hı/hıa
mả, mâ, tỉo, tîo, are [+interrogative]
CPs containing ja can only be the argument of a verb.
Relative clauses must be declarative (lä, :t3:, without hı/hıa, and without ja)
lllocution should only accept Cs that carry :t4:, and the null C,
while verbs should only accept Cs that carry :t5:
These rules are probably incomplete. Where they seem too restrictive, I would suggest that we should err on the side of caution until we have solid syntax and semantics for the parts of the language that are uncontroversial.
is currently accepted by zugaı.
Illocution should select for CPs as follows:
da: CP [+declarative] ka: CP [+declarative] ba: CP [+declarative] moq: CP [+interrogative]
A CP is [+declarative] if its C is and if it contains no hı/hıa.
A CP is [+interrogative] if its C is or it contains hı/hıa
lả, lâ are [+declarative] unless they head a CP containing hı/hıa
mả, mâ, tỉo, tîo, are [+interrogative]
CPs containing ja can only be the argument of a verb.
Relative clauses must be declarative (lä, :t3:, without hı/hıa, and without ja)
lllocution should only accept Cs that carry :t4:, and the null C, while verbs should only accept Cs that carry :t5:
These rules are probably incomplete. Where they seem too restrictive, I would suggest that we should err on the side of caution until we have solid syntax and semantics for the parts of the language that are uncontroversial.