See comment on issue #43.
This actually does not work. The first worker will block the next until it receives a kill (TERM or INT) and then the next one starts. This is not multiple works but running three one after the other. Please remove this incorrect documentation as it will cause people to waste time trying it.
See comment on issue #43.
This actually does not work. The first worker will block the next until it receives a kill (TERM or INT) and then the next one starts. This is not multiple works but running three one after the other. Please remove this incorrect documentation as it will cause people to waste time trying it.