Open jack1120 opened 6 years ago
Oh, yes.
That is because the documentation file for the LULU manuscript was finished before the final version of the LULU algorithm. I must have changed some names. I should correct those names in the documentation files, to keep reproducibility :-)
Thanks!
Hi Tobias,
I ran LULU as described in E_LULU_processing.RMD and got back empty _luluprocessed tables. I could see that the proc_min list (produced at line 87) was not empty, so thought that there may just be an issue with extracting the curated table. Indeed, I think I found what the issue is.
In line 88 of E_LULU_processing.RMD it reads:
curated_table <- proc_min$curated_OTU_table ## extracting the curated table
However, line 179 of the Functions.R script for LULU reads:
result <- list(curated_table = curation_table,
I changed line 88 of E_LULU_processing.RMD to:
curated_table <- proc_min$curated_table ## extracting the curated table
This produced an OTU table that has a smaller file size and contains fewer reads than the original OTU table, so I assume that this solved the problem. Does that seem correct to you?
Thanks, Lauren