Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Confirmed this issue exists and this patch works. Can we get this merged? It's
a simple
fix for a huge aesthetic problem (a lot of pople really don't like dropshadows
on the
lines)
Original comment by kne...@gmail.com
on 11 Jan 2010 at 8:05
I concur. I did it slightly differently, added options.noShadow=true. Not
necessarily better, just different.
See also Tufte on the principle of erasing non-data ink. The shadows are
aesthetically pleasing on charts with less data, but high data-density charts
can be nice without them.
Original comment by rbb362...@gmail.com
on 7 Dec 2010 at 8:28
The syntax changed - you're supposed to set the shadow size through series: {
shadowSize: 0 } (it's mentioned in the API changes in NEWS.txt). What you're
looking at is the backwards compatibility code. But it's true that it's a bug
in that, so I've fixed it with != null (undefined converts to null). Thanks for
the report!
Original comment by olau%iol...@gtempaccount.com
on 15 Dec 2010 at 3:45
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
aspi...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2009 at 4:48