Open lfaraone opened 8 years ago
Worthwhile seeing what's going on here. Is this a limitation of Licensee (i.e., working backwards from the text to know V2.0+) or is it an effort to keep license selection simple.
/cc @benbalter may be interested or have views
Yeah while the author may know where the "or later" is declared it may be complicated outside of assumptions in the COPYING.md
When specifying a GNU license, just a LICENSE file is committed. This means that all new projects become GPLv2-only or GPLv3-only.
It'd be nice to offer options for GPLv2+ vs GPLv2, and make the forward-compatible option more prominently recommended.