Closed DuaneOBrien closed 2 years ago
1) See #77 as another approach -- which, I believe was to have a standard set of questions for which any company can benchmark themselves.
2) Asking respondents to nominate three non-tech companies with innovative or successful OSPOs would be great. Other approaches to open-ended questions create their own problems. I hadn't thought this question's data was presented.
@DuaneOBrien here is the link to what I think you was shared in the presentation (I wasn't actually there): https://thenewstack.io/constructive-open-source-citizenship-produces-results/.
This question is still part of the survey, and I still believe this question is problematic.
@LawrenceHecht can you describe how this was re-written in the draft, I think it's a much better version than what we have
We added two new questions: "Excluding the aforementioned companies, please nominate up to three technology or software companies that exemplify good open source community citizenship..."
Then we ask the same thing about "non-technology or software companies"
We don't need to rate companies.
This issue is from 2020 and was implemented for 2021 survey.
The list of companies in Question 32 inserts bias into the survey that is perpetuated when discussing the survey results. This question should be dropped in favor of a more open-ended question that doesn't bias the results.
I'm opening this issue in response to how I saw the data from this survey presented by The New Stack at All Things Open 2020. I'll post a link to the recorded talk once it has been posted online, and add additional comments when I can offer screenshots and precise observations.