Closed craigez closed 1 year ago
It doesn't have any reference to copyright. The presumption is that if a company is maintaining a project, then the repo is within an "organization" of controlled by the company OR by an employee using a company email address.
Should we be more specific then? I'm guessing we are not meaning to count the linux kernel as a project a company maintains just because they have a subsystem maintainer on staff.
How many open source projects does your company maintain in company controlled organisations or repository hosting environments?
Doesn't sound very good though sorry.
I'm going to sleep on this.
Do we mean this to include projects a company maintainers under their copyright? downstream versions a company maintains? upstream projects in a foundation or other organisation where the company employees act as maintainers? Or are we okay with it being intentionally ambiguous?