Open sydneyfalk opened 5 years ago
I think right now the +/- sign is ordered alphabetically (without math meaning)...
Btw, I'm not against the idea, but having already 26 level of priority isn't enough? Do you really needs 26 * 3 = 78 level of priority?
having already 26 level of priority isn't enough
Can be troublesome if you want to put one task just after all (A)
s but before (B)
s. Then you have to change all Bs to C, all Cs to D etc.
It'd be neat if it did do 'plus and minus'
Sorting is done probably using ASCII codes (at least in Sublime Text when I press [F9], as I use it), so maybe instead of +
you can use !
, as it has code 33, which is sorted before )
's code 41?
I think I may have found either a bug or a missed opportunity for data validation.
Creating a task with (A-) as the priority seemed to work -- it's stored that way, it's prioritized just under 'A', etc.
However, the stated requirements are one English alphabet letter, A-Z, uppercase only. So this probably is unintentional.
(Having said that, when I did see that (A-) worked, I was pleased as punch about the idea we could divide things more finely that way -- however, A+ comes 'after' A. So I figure it's probably unintentional behavior. It'd be neat if it did do 'plus and minus', but I understand that might run counter to the minimalist nature of the tool, too. So not requesting that by any means, but if it's interesting enough to anyone to run with, I wouldn't be unhappy about it.)
(Also, I'm not 100% sure if this should be under the CLI. I haven't tested it with any other interfaces, but I have no idea if they're doing validation above and beyond or what. Sorry if this is in the wrong place!)