Closed tottoto closed 5 months ago
It would be good to document the features we publicly expose.
I think so too. However I think that it is out of scope from this pull request as there is not a document about features
in the README (there is about no_std crates, but it is not a comprehensive document about features). I think it should be a separated concern. I think the scope should be minimum as possible.
It would be good to document the features we publicly expose.
I think so too. However I think that it is out of scope from this pull request as there is not a document about
features
in the README (there is about no_std crates, but it is not a comprehensive document about features). I think it should be a separated concern. I think the scope should be minimum as possible.
I understand
- prost-types uses the old derive feature. I suggest replacing it:
Since it will be a breaking change or requires increasing dependent prost
version, it is not recommended.
- test-no-std uses the old derive feature. I suggest replacing it:
Updated.
Thank you for your contribution
Related to #991.