RDBC currently supports positional parameters with ? syntax but it would be good to have the option of using named parameters as well using :name syntax.
Pretty sure you can enable the transformation of :name syntax to positional syntax at zero cost using macros. However. You are going to use macros, so it's its own set of problems.
RDBC currently supports positional parameters with
?
syntax but it would be good to have the option of using named parameters as well using:name
syntax.