Open Thomasdezeeuw opened 3 weeks ago
Are you able to add a test for https://github.com/tokio-rs/mio/pull/1749#pullrequestreview-2106218677 not being breaking in Tokio? I think we may not have a test for this case.
Are you able to add a test for tokio-rs/mio#1749 (review) not being breaking in Tokio? I think we may not have a test for this case.
It seems like Tokio also has it's own version of SocketAddr
, hence the only code change.
What are you looking for in a test for this?
E.g., calling UnixListener::bind
with an abstract namespace.
E.g., calling
UnixListener::bind
with an abstract namespace.
Doesn't seem like UnixListener::bind
supports abstract name spaces.
Just a status update on this. Before I merge this, the following steps need to happen:
I've already prepared a PR for step 2, but I have not yet gotten around to step 1.
Bumps the MSRV to 1.70.
One breaking changes is the removal of mio::net::SocketAddr, replacing it with std::os::unix::net::SocketAddr. The methods on the type should be the same.
For some smaller OS, such as ESP-IDF and Hermit, it can now be compiled without RUSTFLAGS.