Closed Calinou closed 4 years ago
@Calinou this is actually by intention. Sometimes we do releases that are intended for testing purposes only and not for public use yet.
@Fohlen I see; I thought these were actually intended to be stable releases. In this case, it might be better to distinguish them by adding a beta1
suffix to their tag or something like that.
We can't do that retroactively, so we'd only do it for future tags.
Seems appropriate. How about 0.2.0-alpha
.
We can even use the CI/CD pipeline to mark releases as ready depending on if they have a suffix!
@Fohlen Sounds good to me :slightly_smiling_face:
Marking them as pre-releases prevents them from appearing in the "latest Release" view on the GitHub repository. Moreover, it made the
/latest
URL point to an old version (0.1.9).In the future, we should also edit previous releases so they're marked as stable.