Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I see now that it works as it should. However, if we assume that some users
are like
me, then people won't understand it. Can we make it more user-friendly?
Original comment by ckre...@gmail.com
on 6 Jun 2009 at 12:13
Suggestions for making advanced search more user friendly?
Original comment by eightyst...@gmail.com
on 8 Jun 2009 at 6:06
I emailed you several suggestions last Friday.
Original comment by ckre...@gmail.com
on 8 Jun 2009 at 6:40
How easy would it be to keep the simple search box and button; this becomes the
advanced search button, and any advanced searches are added to whatever is or
was in
the simple search box.
Hope that is explained adequately; basically, just maintain the search button
when
you click "Advanced search" link.
Original comment by tom.alln...@gmail.com
on 8 Jun 2009 at 6:42
Suggestions from Claire's email message:
1) ...if you just change the button to read "search" that would take care of the
problem, because it seems that you can add as many fields as you want by using
the
blank field above labeled "Add a search field" and you don't need to click that
button to add it.
2) ...I would like to change the text above to make it shorter and more
readable -- I
can work on that.
For the first suggestion, I believe that you are required to click the "Add
Search
Criteria" in order for the criteria to be added to the column on the right. If
we
renamed the button to "Search", users might expect search results, but instead
they
will simply have added a search criteria to their query.
Tom, an earlier release implemented your suggestion and it seemed to cause more
confusion.
Hmmm... It sounds like we need to re-think the advanced search UI.
Original comment by eightyst...@gmail.com
on 8 Jun 2009 at 7:14
advanced search here on code.google.com, or the one on scholar.google.com are
potentially good models for the UI
Original comment by tom.alln...@gmail.com
on 17 Feb 2011 at 6:15
Original comment by tom.alln...@gmail.com
on 18 Feb 2011 at 4:11
Original comment by ajmrakot...@gmail.com
on 20 Oct 2011 at 8:01
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ckre...@gmail.com
on 5 Jun 2009 at 7:57