tomay / rebioma

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/rebioma
0 stars 0 forks source link

download file named "record_reviewed.csv" #404

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Search for invalid data
2. Download as csv
3. In the download zip file, view the file named "record_reviewed.csv"

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
There were 15,628 invalid occurrences. None are reviewed (by definition). The 
file named "record_reviewed.csv" shows the review status for only 631 of these 
records, the status of all of these is null.

There are several issues here:
1. If the intent of "record_reviewed" is to show the review status of all 
downloaded records, then there should be 15,628 records in this file, not 631. 
2. But in any case, why show review status of "null" reviewed records, or 
"invalid" occurrences at all? I thought the intent of this file was to give 
credit to reviewers.

In summary:
1. At a minimum, the number of records in this file should match the downloaded 
occurrences, 1 for 1. 
2. Reconsider the need for a file showing review status of invalid records, 
and/or where reviewed = null. 

Original issue reported on code.google.com by tom.alln...@gmail.com on 8 Aug 2011 at 7:26

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
it turns out the 631 records are invalid due to validation errors related to 
Latitude/Longitude, not taxonomy. 

Nonetheless, it's not clear why these appear to be in the queue for review (as 
indicated in their listing in the file "record_reviewed", whereas the rest of 
the records are not. Is this intentional?

Only validated records should be in the review table

Original comment by tom.alln...@gmail.com on 8 Aug 2011 at 11:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The record_reviewed.csv are the records with TRB already assigned that's way 
it's not all the records.
I agree not to show records with reviewed "NULL"

Original comment by ajmrakot...@gmail.com on 10 Aug 2011 at 2:39