tomeshnet / p2p-internet-workshop

Building the Peer-to-Peer Internet workshop series
https://tomeshnet.github.io/p2p-internet-workshop/
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International
99 stars 17 forks source link

Submit Dec 15 Take #73

Closed benhylau closed 5 years ago

benhylau commented 5 years ago

This is Take from the 2018 IPFS grant for my related work up to Dec 15.

Grant administration

Received money from IPFS and decided with contributors about allocation of funds and started Take sheet.

Package workshop materials

Set up CI for official releases of mesh-orange workshop images and more options for people to build custom images.

Hardware research and purchases

We currently received items required to run Module 1-5. Missing some USB adapters and in process to refund the LoRa hardware (wrong items shipped) for Module 6.

Curriculum collaborations

Remote collaborations

Locally in Toronto

benhylau commented 5 years ago

@dcwalk Here it references the same process as the SSBC grant distribution: https://github.com/benhylau/ssbc-grants-scuttlemesh#funds-distribution

Once your Take Request gets two +1's from other collaborators on the list, @benhylau will send you the requested amount to the address and merge your Pull Request.

For example: https://github.com/benhylau/ssbc-grants-scuttlemesh/pull/23#issuecomment-449208203

Slight difference here being the CAD instead of ETHdistribution, so I think the receiver should merge once they receive a cheque. In my case, I won't write myself a cheque since the money is already in my personal account. So once I get two +1's I will just merge it.

Also the pattern of having a repo for the ssbc grants v. having this all in one take file is something I'm not sure about.

While doing SSBC grant's tracking, the cross-referencing of issues and PRs also caused a lot of confusion. Issues are tracked here already, so I hope we start with this and can move tracking sheet later on if needed, as I said here: https://github.com/tomeshnet/p2p-internet-workshop/pull/72#issuecomment-447604008