Open porky11 opened 7 years ago
So it could also work for types with more than one type argument (I would have fixed it myself, but the typearguments in the expansion are not unquoted, else I would just use an uql instead)
or take a number as second (maybe optional) argument, so you cannot define types with wrong numbers of arguments by accident
So it could also work for types with more than one type argument (I would have fixed it myself, but the typearguments in the expansion are not unquoted, else I would just use an uql instead)